On Inequality: What Exactly Are We Trying To Do Here?

From the State of the Union to Janet Yellen to countless articles (1, 2, 3, 4), income inequality has emerged as a defining part of American political and economic discourse. For all of its negative effects on the social and moral (not to mention economic and political) identities of America, it is little wonder that there are calls for a “fix” to income inequality.

However, I was struck by the ambiguity of the word “fix”. What does success look like? Can we fix it if we don’t know what the goal is?

To find out, I surveyed 40 people that I reached through Twitter, Facebook, and email (the survey). The results, while admittedly unscientific, were surprising.

The respondents tended to reflect my peer group: educated young professionals working in finance, economics, or education. I recognize that this sample is too small and selected to represent the population but if anything, this sample should over represent those interested in the topic with the know-how to understand what the heck we’re talking about.

The first surprise was how unconfident the respondents were. Only 17.5% rated their knowledge a 4 or 5 out of 5, while about half gave themselves a 3. My guess is that if this non-random group, of all groups, is either uneducated on the issue of feels uneducated, then the general population must be even worse. We are not able to confidently speak on the issue, which can be changed, but is not an encouraging sign to leaders hoping to awaken a movement immediately.

Self Declared Knowledge

The second (and biggest) surprise is that there is no consensus on what success looks like. I asked what the ideal income distribution looks like. For the most part, the respondents agreed that no one should be poor, but that’s where the similarities stop. After about $45,000 in household income, respondents quickly diverged. Some  wanted everyone to be rich while others wanted to retain some inequality (I fall into the second camp- I’d like income as an incentive for work once basic needs are met).

Income Inequality Ideals Responses

The diversity of responses signals that even within a group of seemingly similar people, there is yet to develop an agreement of where we should point the ship. There also was no significant relationship between how knowledgeable respondents reported they were and the likelihood of them putting most or all of the income in the top four income brackets.

Nevertheless, there is a general perception that income is too unequal now. I compared the survey results to the actual US household income distribution in 2012 (Table HINC-06): respondents wanted fewer households at either extreme overall. In 2012, 13% of US households earned less than $15,000 while the mean ideal was 1.25%. At the other extreme, 12.5% earned more than $135,000 while the mean ideal was 5%.

Census data from CPS Survey Table HINC-06. Downloaded 2/12/14.

Census data from CPS Survey Table HINC-06. Downloaded 2/12/14.

There is little disagreement that income inequality is a problem. Almost everyone wants something to change. Figuring out what should change and to what end, however, is a bit more complex.  As the Saint-Exupèry saying (now clichè) goes: “if you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.” The issue with income inequality is that we all yearn for different seas.

Recognized Data Issues:

The full set of responses (excluding comments) can be found here. Some issues I recognize with this survey include a small non-random sample, limited response options, limited and inexact income/wealth brackets, a the lack of the “household” qualifier in the questions.

I’d love to hear what you think about income inequality, the survey, or the analysis, so don’t hesitate to reach out.


2 thoughts on “On Inequality: What Exactly Are We Trying To Do Here?

  1. Scott F says:

    I can certainly get behind wanting to increase the wealth of the lowest end of the spectrum, but it’d take quite a bit of effort for me to understand why it would be ideal to have fewer people on the high end of things. Futhermore, I’m not sure that this premise is well founded. I don’t care very much about one’s income, I care far more about their access to needs. Income is one way of increasing one’s abilities to gather goods/services but it’s by no means the only route, and not necessarily the most effective. Simply having people feel that they have the power these things (i.e. increasing their sense of autonomy) is probably a bigger step in the right direction than (somehow) increasing their income. The other question, if we assume that increasing their income is the best course, is how to get there. I think the ambiguity of the benefits of closing the income gap, and the added mire of what kind of policies that would get us there, are both good reasons to be merky on what that distribution ought to look like.

    • I completely agree that, at its core, the end goal should be for people to have their needs met. I like some income inequality (provided no one is poor) because it provides an opportunity for growth and movement. By that I mean that I like the idea of knowing that if I create something wonderful, I can potentially be rewarded for it.

      From a leadership point of view, I’m actually less concerned with “how we get there” because we don’t even know where “there” is. I’m not sure how to judge policy options because I don’t know what success looks like beyond “fewer poor people”. I hope that changes soon, though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s